Tag: employment agreement,employment contract,non-compete,contract review,contract clauses

  • How to Review an Employment Agreement in 10 Minutes

    How to Review an Employment Agreement in 10 Minutes

    How to Review an Employment Agreement in 10 Minutes

    The average employment agreement is 8–15 pages. A thorough manual review takes 60–90 minutes. Most lawyers charge $350–500/hour for the work. Most employees sign without reading past page two.

    Both approaches are wrong. A structured 10-minute review catches the clauses that actually matter — the non-compete that could prevent you from working for two years, the IP assignment that hands your side project to your employer, the severance clause that evaporates if you do not sign a release within 21 days.

    This framework gives you the 10-minute protocol, the 15 clauses that demand attention, role-specific red flags, and state-specific rules that can make the difference between an enforceable restriction and a void one.

    Upload your employment agreement to Clause Labs free and get a clause-by-clause risk analysis in under 60 seconds — before you start your manual review.

    The 10-Minute Framework

    This timed approach assumes you have already read the agreement once (or used an AI tool for initial clause identification). The 10 minutes are for focused risk analysis, not first reading.

    Minutes 1–2: Identify the Basics
    – Parties: Who is the employer entity? (The parent company? A subsidiary? An LLC you have never heard of?)
    – Position and title: Does the description match what was discussed?
    – Effective date and employment type: At-will or fixed term?
    – Compensation start date: Does it align with your expected start?

    Minutes 3–4: Compensation Deep Dive
    – Base salary: Annual amount, payment frequency, any conditions
    – Bonus: Discretionary (“may”) or guaranteed (“shall”)? Pro-rated for partial years?
    – Equity: Type (options, RSUs, profit interests), vesting schedule, acceleration triggers
    – Benefits: Start date for benefits (day one or after 90 days?)

    Minutes 5–6: Restrictive Covenants (the High-Stakes Section)
    – Non-compete: Duration, geographic scope, activity scope
    – Non-solicitation: Clients, employees, or both?
    – Confidentiality: Definition breadth, duration (employment or perpetual?)
    – Check enforceability in the relevant state (see state guide below)

    Minutes 7–8: Termination Provisions
    – For cause: How is “cause” defined? How many cure opportunities?
    – Without cause: What notice period? What severance?
    – Resignation: What notice do you owe? Any forfeiture of unvested equity?
    – Change of control: Acceleration of equity? Enhanced severance?

    Minutes 9–10: IP, Dispute Resolution, and Deal-Breakers
    – IP assignment: Scope (all inventions or only work-related?)
    – Prior inventions exclusion: Is there a carve-out schedule?
    – Dispute resolution: Arbitration (mandatory?) or litigation?
    – Governing law: Which state? Does it match your location?
    – Anything that contradicts verbal promises made during negotiations

    The 15 Employment Agreement Clauses to Check

    1. At-Will Statement or Employment Term

    What to look for: Whether the agreement establishes at-will employment (terminable by either party at any time) or a fixed term (1 year, 2 years). Most employment agreements in the US are at-will.

    Green flag: Clear at-will language with mutual termination rights and reasonable notice provisions.

    Red flag: At-will language combined with aggressive restrictive covenants — you can be fired at any time, but you cannot compete for 2 years.

    2. Position and Duties

    What to look for: A “duties as assigned” clause that gives the employer unlimited discretion to change your role. This is scope creep written into the contract.

    Green flag: Specific position title with a defined reporting structure and a description of core responsibilities.

    Red flag: “Such duties as may be assigned from time to time by the Company” — this language lets the employer change your role without renegotiating compensation.

    3. Base Salary and Payment Schedule

    What to look for: Confirm the annual amount matches the offer letter. Check whether the employer can reduce salary unilaterally.

    Red flag: “The Company reserves the right to modify compensation at its sole discretion.” If they can cut your pay without your consent, the salary number in the agreement is a ceiling, not a floor.

    4. Bonus Structure

    What to look for: The difference between “eligible for” and “entitled to.” Discretionary bonuses are entirely within the employer’s control. Target bonuses with defined metrics are enforceable.

    Red flag: A “target bonus of 20% of base salary” with language stating the bonus is “entirely discretionary and does not vest until paid.” That target is aspirational, not contractual.

    5. Equity and Option Grants

    What to look for: Grant size, type (ISOs vs. NSOs, RSUs vs. options), vesting schedule, cliff period, and exercise window after termination.

    Red flag: A 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff and a 90-day exercise window post-termination. The 90-day window can force employees to exercise options they cannot afford — especially with ISOs where the tax implications of exercise can be significant. Some recent employment agreements extend post-termination exercise windows to 12 months or longer.

    Critical for executives: Check for acceleration upon change of control (single-trigger vs. double-trigger). Double-trigger acceleration (requires both a change of control AND termination) is standard; single-trigger is more favorable to the employee.

    6. Benefits and Perquisites

    What to look for: Start date for benefits, whether specific benefits (health insurance, 401k match) are contractually guaranteed or subject to change.

    Red flag: “Employee shall be eligible to participate in benefits generally available to employees, as the Company may modify from time to time.” This lets the employer eliminate benefits without breaching the agreement.

    7. Non-Compete Provisions

    This is the single highest-risk clause for employees and the most frequently litigated for employers.

    What to look for: Duration (6 months, 12 months, 24 months), geographic scope (city, state, nationwide, worldwide), and activity scope (competing business, or any business in the same industry?).

    Red flag language: “Employee shall not, for a period of 24 months following termination for any reason, directly or indirectly engage in any business that competes with any business conducted by the Company or any of its affiliates, anywhere in the United States.”

    This is unenforceable in most states because it is overbroad in scope, geography, and duration — but the employee still has to litigate to prove that, which is expensive. See the state enforceability guide below.

    8. Non-Solicitation

    What to look for: Whether the restriction covers client solicitation, employee solicitation (anti-raiding), or both. Client non-solicits are generally more enforceable than non-competes.

    Red flag: Non-solicitation of clients you brought to the firm from prior relationships. This is especially problematic for sales professionals and lawyers changing firms.

    9. Confidentiality and NDA Provisions

    What to look for: How broadly “confidential information” is defined, whether it survives termination (and for how long), and whether it includes information you already knew.

    Red flag: A definition that encompasses “all information provided to Employee during employment, whether or not marked as confidential.” This can swallow publicly available information and general industry knowledge. The standard NDA exclusions — independently developed, publicly known, received from third parties — should apply here too.

    10. Invention Assignment and IP Clause

    What to look for: Whether the assignment covers all inventions (including personal projects) or only those related to the employer’s business. Whether there is an excluded inventions schedule.

    Red flag: “Employee hereby assigns to the Company all right, title, and interest in any and all inventions, works of authorship, and intellectual property created during the term of employment.” No “related to company business” qualifier. No excluded inventions schedule. This language could assign your personal blog posts, side projects, and weekend apps to your employer.

    State note: Several states limit these broad assignments. California (Lab. Code § 2870), Delaware, Illinois, Minnesota, Washington, and others protect inventions created entirely on the employee’s own time without employer resources, unrelated to the employer’s business.

    11. Termination for Cause Definition

    What to look for: Specificity. A vague “cause” definition gives the employer maximum discretion. A specific definition protects the employee.

    Green flag: “Cause” means: (a) conviction of a felony, (b) willful misconduct causing material harm, (c) material breach of this agreement after 30 days’ written notice and opportunity to cure.

    Red flag: “Cause” includes “any conduct the Company determines, in its sole discretion, to be detrimental to the Company’s interests.” Sole discretion language makes every termination a “for cause” termination — meaning no severance.

    12. Severance Terms

    What to look for: Amount (months of salary), conditions (signing a release), timing (lump sum or salary continuation), and acceleration triggers.

    Red flag: Severance conditioned on signing a general release within 21 days, with the release waiving age discrimination claims under the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (29 U.S.C. § 626). The 21-day period is a legal requirement for valid OWBPA waivers — but the release itself may waive claims you should preserve. Always review the release before signing.

    13. Release Requirements

    What to look for: Whether severance requires signing a release of all claims. Whether the release carves out certain rights (workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, vested benefits).

    Red flag: A release that waives “any and all claims” without exceptions for non-waivable statutory rights.

    14. Dispute Resolution

    What to look for: Mandatory arbitration versus right to litigate. Whether the arbitration clause includes a class action waiver. Who selects the arbitrator. Who pays arbitration costs.

    Red flag: Mandatory arbitration with costs split equally, administered by an arbitration provider chosen by the employer, in a jurisdiction far from the employee’s residence. This creates practical barriers to pursuing claims.

    15. Governing Law and Jurisdiction

    What to look for: Whether the governing law matches the state where you work. Whether the jurisdiction clause is favorable or burdensome.

    Red flag for employees: Governing law set to a state with strong non-compete enforcement (e.g., Florida) when the employee works in a state with weaker enforcement (e.g., California). Note: courts do not always honor choice-of-law provisions that circumvent local employee protections — but the litigation to challenge it is expensive.

    Employment Agreement Red Flags by Role

    Executive Agreements

    Executives face unique risks that standard employment agreements do not address:

    • Change of control provisions: Does equity accelerate? Does severance increase? What constitutes “good reason” for resignation?
    • Clawback clauses: Can the employer claw back bonus compensation? Under what circumstances?
    • D&O insurance and indemnification: Are you covered for actions taken in your corporate role?
    • Garden leave: Some agreements require you to remain employed (but not working) during the non-compete period — this is more common in financial services and increasingly in tech.

    Sales Roles

    • Commission structure: Is the commission plan part of the agreement, or an external document the employer can modify unilaterally?
    • Territory and account ownership: What happens to your accounts and pipeline on departure?
    • Tail commissions: Are you paid on deals that close after your departure if you initiated them?

    Technology Roles

    • IP assignment breadth: The most critical clause. Does it extend to personal projects, open source contributions, or work done on personal equipment outside business hours?
    • Moonlighting restrictions: Can you do freelance work, teach, or contribute to open source?
    • Open source obligations: If your work involves open source components, does the agreement create conflicts with open source licenses?

    Healthcare Roles

    • Non-compete geographic scope: Healthcare non-competes often define geography by radius from practice locations — 10 miles in a dense metro area is very different from 10 miles in a rural setting
    • Tail coverage: Who pays for malpractice insurance after departure?
    • Credentialing timelines: The agreement should account for the 60–120 day credentialing gap when changing employers

    State-Specific Employment Agreement Issues

    Non-compete enforceability varies dramatically by state. This single variable can determine whether a restrictive covenant is a real constraint or unenforceable ink.

    State Non-Compete Status Key Details
    California Banned Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600 voids virtually all non-competes
    Minnesota Banned Prohibited for most workers as of July 2023
    Oklahoma Banned Statute voids non-competes; non-solicits may be enforceable
    North Dakota Banned Century Code § 9-08-06
    Illinois Income threshold Unenforceable below $75,000 salary threshold; 14-day attorney review notice required
    Massachusetts Restricted Garden leave or “other mutually-agreed consideration” required; max 12 months
    Colorado Income threshold Unenforceable for workers earning below threshold; additional restrictions for non-solicits
    Washington Income threshold Threshold adjusted annually (~$116,594 for employees in 2025)
    Florida Enforceable Fla. Stat. § 542.335 provides detailed enforcement framework; generally favorable to employers
    Texas Enforceable Requires ancillary to enforceable agreement; courts may reform overbroad covenants

    Federal update: The FTC’s proposed nationwide non-compete ban was struck down by courts in 2024, and the FTC voluntarily dismissed its appeals in September 2025. Non-compete regulation remains primarily a state-law issue. However, the FTC has signaled it will pursue case-by-case enforcement actions against non-competes it views as anticompetitive.

    Bottom line: Always check the governing law state. A non-compete governed by California law is essentially unenforceable. The same clause governed by Florida law is a real constraint. For more on how governing law interacts with other risky clauses, see our guide to contract clauses that cause costly mistakes.

    The Employer vs. Employee Perspective

    The same clause creates different concerns depending on which side you represent:

    Clause Employer Concern Employee Concern Negotiation Tip
    Non-compete Is it enforceable enough to protect us? Is it narrow enough to let me work elsewhere? Narrow the scope; increase the severance
    IP assignment Does it capture all work product? Does it capture my personal projects? Add an excluded inventions schedule
    Termination for cause Is “cause” broad enough for protection? Is “cause” specific enough to prevent pretextual firing? List specific cause events; require cure periods
    Severance Is the cost justified by the hire? Is the safety net adequate? Tie severance to non-compete duration
    Bonus Is discretion preserved? Is the target meaningful? Add objective metrics and partial-year proration

    How AI Speeds Up Employment Agreement Review

    The 10-minute framework above works. But it works faster when you start with AI-assisted clause identification.

    Clause Labs’s employment agreement playbook identifies all 15 clauses listed above, flags risk levels on each, detects missing provisions (no severance clause? no IP carve-out? no cure period for cause termination?), and generates redline suggestions — all in under 60 seconds. You then apply the framework above to the flagged issues rather than scanning the entire document.

    The combination of AI-first analysis and structured human review compresses a 60–90 minute review into 15–20 minutes while catching issues that even experienced reviewers miss on manual pass-throughs. Try it free on your next employment agreement — the risk report takes under 60 seconds. See our complete red flag checklist for the broader framework applicable to all contract types, and our comparison of AI contract review tools for how different platforms handle employment agreements.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the single most important clause in an employment agreement?

    For employees: the non-compete (because it controls your career after this job). For employers: the IP assignment clause (because it protects the company’s most valuable assets). For both: the termination and severance provisions, which define the economic consequences of the relationship ending.

    Can I negotiate an at-will employment agreement?

    Yes. At-will is the default, but many terms within an at-will agreement are negotiable: severance triggers, notice periods, bonus vesting on termination, and equity acceleration. You are not negotiating away “at-will” status (which would require a fixed-term contract); you are negotiating the economic terms around termination.

    Should I hire a lawyer to review my employment agreement?

    If total compensation exceeds $150,000, or if the agreement contains restrictive covenants, or if you are receiving equity — yes. The cost of a review ($500–$2,000) is trivial compared to the risk of a bad non-compete or a missed IP assignment clause. For a faster and more affordable first pass, upload the agreement to Clause Labs for instant risk identification, then consult a lawyer on the flagged issues.

    How do I review an employment agreement for a friend or family member?

    If you are not their lawyer, be careful. Providing specific legal advice on someone else’s employment agreement could create an inadvertent attorney-client relationship. You can explain general concepts and point them to resources like this guide, but for actionable advice on their specific agreement, they should consult their own attorney or use a structured review tool.


    This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.